Bug#882795: closed by Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> (Bug#882795: fixed in cltl 1.0.28)
- Subject: Bug#882795: closed by Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> (Bug#882795: fixed in cltl 1.0.28)
- From: debian@helgefjell.de (Helge Kreutzmann)
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 17:46:21 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20180106164621.GA27314@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal>
- In-reply-to: <handler.882795.D882795.151456346413531.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
- References: <E1eUx8v-000Fy0-6h@fasolo.debian.org> <20171126210610.GA7014@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal> <handler.882795.D882795.151456346413531.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <20171126210610.GA7014@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal>
reopen 882795
reopen 881407
found 882795 1.0.28
found 881407 1.0.28
Hello S?bastien,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:06:10PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #882795: cltl: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
>
> It has been closed by S?bastien Villemot <sebastien at debian.org>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
?
> * Translation updates:
> - Dutch (Frans Spiesschaert) (Closes: #881407)
> - German (Helge Kreutzmann) (Closes: #882795)
Unfortunately you did not include the updated files both from the
German as well as from the Dutch team.
It would be kind if you could check *before* the upload, if all
strings are translated, e.g. by running
'msgfmt --statistics <pofile.po>'
If you find such, most translators (including me) would be happy to
fix those strings.
Could you please perform an upload including our updates?
Thanks!
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian at helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20180106/7cf4ab23/attachment.sig>
Reply to: