[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license

Hello Dmitry,

On 16/04/16 04:21, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> The following files are licensed under non-DFSG compliant license:
> Files:                                                                                                                                                                               
  <all of PCL>

> License: Xerox-LUN

Checking the copy in sbcl for example is missing the clause, which I
think you object to:

>  Any person obtaining a copy of this software is requested to send their
>  name and post office or electronic mail address to:
>    CommonLoops Coordinator
>    Xerox PARC
>    3333 Coyote Hill Rd.
>    Palo Alto, CA 94304
>  (or send Arpanet mail to CommonLoops-Coordinator.pa at Xerox.arpa)
>  .
>  Suggestions, comments and requests for improvements are also welcome.

As the last release of PCL was in September 1992 and PARC stopped doing
common lisp, I think that no-one is listening for any emails anymore and
that we can simply remove this request.

Would you agree to this?

Best regards, Peter

signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson|

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 989 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20160419/bce9c946/attachment.sig>

Reply to: