On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 09:36:20AM -0400, Far? wrote: > The problem is you're still using an old asdf 1.704. Newer c-l-c's > should include a requirement of asdf > 2.000 (a package for 2.005 is > underway), but c-l-c 7.2 is buggy in not declaring such a version > requirement. > Thank you -- John Foerch