SBCL blocked at 0.9.16 in testing
- Subject: SBCL blocked at 0.9.16 in testing
- From: pvaneynd@mailworks.org (Peter Van Eynde)
- Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 05:46:29 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 481D3195.3070000@mailworks.org>
- In-reply-to: <87prs7r1lf.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
- References: <654935030804270744h4c3d1480re1c21b4db92741ca@mail.gmail.com> <20080427153154.GB16597@networkno.de> <87prs7r1lf.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
Hi all,
Luca Capello wrote:
>> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going
>> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16
>> binaries from lenny.
>
> Since manpower for the Debian Common Lisp Team is lacking (help is
> always appreciated), I think that we should maintain only the
> architectures we can provide support for.
I fear I must agree with Luca here. Some architectures break with ease
and we do not have good development machines for all architectures.
A token problem child is sparc. Before sperger.debian.org came along
for a long long time there was no machine available. And some build
problems only seem to happen on the buildd machines :-(.
In fact I was certain I had created a bug asking for the removal of all
unsupported architectures from testing, but I cannot find this bug now. :-(
I'll wait until the end of May. Any architectures not uploaded by
someone else will get removed, ok?
Groetjes, Peter
--
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave
Aronson|
Reply to: