Bug#860915: marked as done (cloud-initramfs-tools: Please re-enable generation of the overlayroot package)
Your message dated Thu, 2 Mar 2023 00:17:42 +0100
with message-id <c1cb1b56-860d-ffb0-dd9a-2e165fe5177f@debian.org>
and subject line This bug can be closed
has caused the Debian Bug report #860915,
regarding cloud-initramfs-tools: Please re-enable generation of the overlayroot package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
860915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: cloud-initramfs-tools: Please re-enable generation of the overlayroot package
- From: Scott Barker <scott@mostlylinux.ca>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:40:57 -0600
- Message-id: <149280365746.4743.7166553304155850940.reportbug@laptop.mostlylinux.ca>
Source: cloud-initramfs-tools
Version: 0.18.debian5
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Please re-enable generation of the overlayroot package. Debian stretch now
includes the overlay filesystem module. Thank you.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug can be closed, I believe the current version in Debian has the
requested feature.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: