Re: Resignation as cloud team delegate
Moin
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:21:51PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Great, most of that seems like a clear improvement. But there's one change I'm
> not sure about:
>
> --- original 2022-07-01 21:40:33.826069834 -0700
> +++ draft 2022-07-01 21:40:45.778221446 -0700
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> - With the Debian Project Leader and under the auspices of the
> Trusted Organizations, establish Debian accounts with cloud
> - providers, negotiating terms and conditions where necessary.
> + providers for the purpose of managing cloud images
>
> Are you thinking the delegation needs to enumerate responsibilities more
> specifically? If so, we have other projects unrelated to VM images:
> - provider-specific mirror infrastructure.
> - build systems for docker images on docker.io and public.ecr.aws.
- QA stuff, like ci.debian.net and archive rebuilds
- random systems for other teams
- infrastructure for cloud team use
With the above change, we can't longer provide those.
> A bigger consequence would be that other teams could establish official
> provider accounts for Debian.
Even before, the delegation was not exclusive. And the DPL is free to
delegate as they wishes. So this does not change IMHO.
> I'm not sure what I think of that. There are
> some downsides:
> I'm not sure what I think of these tradeoffs. But I do think we should
> consider them. What do you and other team members think?
Even I don't know if we have an overview over the resources Debian have
access to. I tried to document the ones the cloud team has, including
who can make use of them. I'm not entirely okay with the form I chose,
but at least we have it. But what about others?
Bastian
--
All your people must learn before you can reach for the stars.
-- Kirk, "The Gamesters of Triskelion", stardate 3259.2
Reply to: