Re: Bug#835086: RFP: nextcloud -- self-hosted cloud services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> David Prévot wrote:
> > Le 22/09/2016 à 01:08, Sam Hartman a écrit :
> > >>>>>> "Xavier" == Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes:
> > > Xavier> Le mardi 20 septembre 2016 à 19:38 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff
> > > >> Nack. It's not an important package if we can't support it
> > > >> properly. Let's not repeat the owncloud disaster.
> > >
> > > Xavier> OK, I understand the "official" debian point of view.
> > >
> > > I don't think this is an official Debian POV, simply the opinion of some
> > > Debian contributors...
> >
> > Moritz is an active and well known member of the security team.
>
> That still doesn't make his opinion "official". I don't think that
> something like an "official Debian opinion" exists at all.
However there is are "official" Debian opionions that are shared widely.
Example given: Let's not repeat the .* disaster.
> > The current ownCloud upstream maintainers reached back to us a few
> > months ago and are willing to help (or at least not be as obnoxious as
> > the ones who drove the package away from Debian, and are now gone in the
> > nextcloud fork team).
>
> Do I read that right, the chances for nextCloud in Debian are rather
> low while the chances to get ownCloud back in Debian raised due to the
> obnoxious upstream developers left together with nextCloud fork and
> the remaining developers are more friendly towards distributions?
Yes, that is what I did also read in it.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
- --
Leven en laten leven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=Bqpq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: