[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Straw poll - cloud-init in base AMIs (was Re: cloud-init_0.7.1-3~bpo70+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into wheezy-backports, wheezy-backports)

Well done Charles. Great to see.

I'd like to poll the audience if I may about if we should pull wheezy-backports into the sources.list of the EC2 AMIs, and/or if should pull in cloud-init from backports for today/tomorrows base AMI builds?  Many may feel passionately that a base AMI should be only including packages from main and not from backports - but counter to this is that this is not a general purpose image but specific for EC2? It may be that for this weekend is a little late, and perhaps we should look at this for 7.0.x (for $x>0)?


On 4/05/2013 1:19 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
 cloud-init (0.7.1-3~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low
   * Backported for Wheezy.
Hello everybody,
the backport of cloud-init made its way in Wheezy.  I will not have time to
test it in the next few days.  If you build Wheezy images, I would be very
interested to read your feedback if you add the cloud-init backport to them !

Mobile: +61 422 166 708, Email: james_AT_rcpt.to

Reply to: