Well done Charles. Great to see.
I'd like to poll the audience if I may about if we should pull wheezy-backports into the sources.list of the EC2 AMIs, and/or if should pull in cloud-init from backports for today/tomorrows base AMI builds? Many may feel passionately that a base AMI should be only including packages from main and not from backports - but counter to this is that this is not a general purpose image but specific for EC2? It may be that for this weekend is a little late, and perhaps we should look at this for 7.0.x (for $x>0)?
On 4/05/2013 1:19 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Changes: cloud-init (0.7.1-3~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low * Backported for Wheezy.Hello everybody, the backport of cloud-init made its way in Wheezy. I will not have time to test it in the next few days. If you build Wheezy images, I would be very interested to read your feedback if you add the cloud-init backport to them !
Mobile: +61 422 166 708, Email: james_AT_rcpt.to