Re: armel 2.0.10-5 Dep-Wait: libmono-dev (>= 2.4+dfsg-5)
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 14:30 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Jo Shields<directhex@apebox.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:03 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I am still struggling to get my gdcm: debian/control file right. As
> >> you can see on the buildd page, I am still getting:
> >>
> >> https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gdcm
> >>
> >> armel 2.0.10-5 Dep-Wait: libmono-dev (>= 2.4+dfsg-5)
> >> and
> >> mipsel 2.0.10-5 Dep-Wait: mono-runtime
> >>
> >> While my debian/control looks like:
> >>
> >> Build-Depends-Indep: cli-common-dev (>= 0.5.7),
> >> mono-devel (>= 2.0) | mono-mcs (>= 1.0) | mono-gmcs (>= 1.1.8)
> >>
> >> mono-devel /mono-mcs / mono-gmcs should be available on 'all'
> >> architecture right ? (I know I need to remove dep on mono-gmcs,
> >> mono-mcs in the near future).
> >
> > armel we had a FTBFS on 2.4+dfsg-5. It should be fixed soonish. mipsel
> > we don't ship support for (although this may be functional in Mono 2.6)
>
> Does this means I should explicitely Builds-Depends-Indep [!armel
> !mipsel] for now ? I'd like to see if the other binary package are
> building fine on those arch but for now I haven't had much luck, it
> always stop way too early (at mono dependency problem).
armel it's just a FTBFS, so dep-wait is to be expected. mipsel, yes, you
should !mipsel the build-depend.
Reply to: