Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1068559: Bug#1068559: zfs-linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: zfs-test-suite times out (hangs?)
- To: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Cc: "1068559@bugs.debian.org" <1068559@bugs.debian.org>, Debian CI team <debian-ci@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1068559: Bug#1068559: zfs-linux: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: zfs-test-suite times out (hangs?)
- From: 陈 晟祺 <harry-chen@outlook.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 05:03:50 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] F91318BE-5629-4D06-AA2D-6C6B9F521F0C@outlook.com>
- In-reply-to: <58aaec3b-d82e-40dc-9581-3d54a4818a22@debian.org>
- References: <89666851-4e03-4219-b0b0-570f41c39888@debian.org> <89666851-4e03-4219-b0b0-570f41c39888@debian.org> <AE74A195-D45D-433E-B39B-B4D10D1C2286@outlook.com> <A61A5E31-F1FE-4A7B-B28E-3315CFC7043A@outlook.com> <ee05e9ad-91ff-430b-9c0e-b12c5ed13d38@debian.org> <1ECD0222-F111-41E1-B7D0-CFF5597B3DD2@outlook.com> <89666851-4e03-4219-b0b0-570f41c39888@debian.org> <ddf59c7b-1a3f-408e-8cdd-8863e4fb98a0@debian.org> <F974245A-5E80-4CE7-8711-EDFB5443A59C@outlook.com> <89666851-4e03-4219-b0b0-570f41c39888@debian.org> <69368310-158d-4431-bb8f-45fe50d48e30@debian.org> <AA669000-72BD-405B-9C28-6C1F05B25811@outlook.com> <998FBAB5-210B-4413-8B10-08E5DC13D35A@outlook.com> <cfa78c63-4a5b-4dc0-9f94-961f2f776720@debian.org> <89666851-4e03-4219-b0b0-570f41c39888@debian.org> <3660b32a-ca16-40fa-a903-9465d6a7e813@debian.org> <50360C82-ADFF-4C31-AB62-83D8F1369A5F@outlook.com> <16993f53-a584-4798-b367-5f4ff7b386f7@debian.org> <A8294832-AD9E-4474-9DAB-1107D433A438@outlook.com> <58aaec3b-d82e-40dc-9581-3d54a4818a22@debian.org>
Hi
>
> In the end it's your decision. All I can say is that tests that are flaky enough (my level is roughly worse than 1/8) and not marked as such are considered RC buggy.
>
Seems test stanza tagged with ‘isolated-machine’ are still not run by default.
I have enabled only minimal & essentials tests since version 2.2.4-2.
Would you please add zfs-linux to the enabled list?
Thanks,
Shengqi Chen
Reply to: