Hi Paul, thanks for your quick reply.
I am currently wondering why the testing autopkgtests for suricata are failing [0] due to a missing dependency on libssl3 (= 3.1.5-1) via libssl-dev. That libssl3 version exists in testing [1, 2] but not in unstable (likely because of the t64 transition?). I would expect this testing test to use the testing version of the library though, right?The time_t transition is stretching the upgrade capabilities beyond what apt is able to handle in a lot of cases.
I see.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance for any pointers.The test passes in unstable. So if you're not in a hurry, I would just sit out the time_t transition. It's not worth your time to figure out how to work around it. Our testing migration setup used for autopkgtest just isn't working in a lot of time_t related scenarios.
OK, good to know. I was just concerned that something unrelated to my packaging was keeping suricata out of testing, but on the other hand with the time_t thing still ongoing, it's unlikely for a sneaky release to happen in the meantime ;) Thanks; will wait for now and keep an eye on things. Thanks again! Best regards Sascha
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature