Source: pam, frr
Control: found -1 pam/1.4.0-2
Control: found -1 frr/7.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci@lists.debian.org, ivodd@debian.org
User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of pam the autopkgtest of frr fails in testing on
armhf and ppc64el when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of pam from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:
pass fail
pam from testing 1.4.0-2
frr from testing 7.4-1
all others from testing from testing
I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
Currently this regression is blocking the migration of pam to testing
[1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against
both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the
bug to the right package?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pam
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/f/frr/9682558/log.gz
autopkgtest [11:36:52]: test py-frr-reload: [-----------------------
1634
1647
1652
Note: this version of vtysh never writes vtysh.conf
Building Configuration...
Integrated configuration saved to /etc/frr/frr.conf
[OK]
autopkgtest [11:36:54]: test py-frr-reload: -----------------------]
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature