Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
Hi Paul,
thanks for the clarification. This commit
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/commit/6a874a89365671dd37a14a9bca25290dc55a1fc9
imports the current data. I will tests this a bit more and than activate
in a cron job as importer.
Thanks a lot for your contribution
Andreas.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:05:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 09-04-2020 22:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > valid_keys = ( 'run_id',
> > # 'created_at', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
> > # 'updated_at', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
> > 'suite',
> > 'arch',
> > 'package', # ----> should be renamed to 'source'
> > 'version',
> > 'trigger', # usually package.*version
> I expected you to mostly see "" or "migration-reference/0" here, with
> some hand crafted text from random DD's.
>
> > 'status',
> > 'requestor', # 'britney', 'debci' or e-mail
>
> Debian login to be precise, not e-mail.
>
> > 'pin_packages', # []
>
> Since a couple of months this json and other pages only show "pure"
> suite runs, to pin_packages is always empty. pin_packages contains which
> packages are taken from another suite than the base suite.
>
> > # 'worker', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored (is 'null' anyway)
>
> Oh, bug somewhere I guess.
>
> > 'date',
> > 'duration_seconds',
> > 'last_pass_date',
> > 'last_pass_version',
> > 'message', # see below
> > 'previous_status',
> > # 'duration_human', # Paul Gevers: duration_seconds and duration_human feel double and the former is leaner for in a database
> > # 'blame', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
> > )
> >
> > # message can be
> > # $ grep '"message"' packages*.json | sed 's/^.*\.json: *//' | sort | uniq
> > # "message": "All tests passed" -> "status": "pass"
> > # "message": "Could not run tests due to a temporary testbed failure" -> "status": "tmpfail"
> > # "message": "elbrus" -> "status": "tmpfail"
> > # "message": "Erroneous package" -> "status": "fail"
> > # "message": null -> "status": "fail"
> > # "message": "No tests in this package or all skipped" -> "status": "neutral"
> > # "message": "Tests failed", -> "status": "fail"
> > # "message": "Tests failed, and at least one test skipped" -> "status": "fail"
> > # "message": "Tests passed, but at least one test skipped" -> "status": "pass"
> > # "message": "Unexpected autopkgtest exit code 20" -> "status": "tmpfail"
> >
> > I agree that leaving out worker which is really always null makes sense
> > but I tend to leave message since leaving this out looks like loosing
> > information. I tried to find a relation to status but it seems the same
> > status can result in different messages. I think just a field in addition
> > will not blow up UDD way more than it recently is - may be I consider
> > a normalised form, but usually UDD is not very normalised at all.
>
> In general this is the final output from autopkgtest. But, as you see my
> name there, I had to clean up several times and to be able to find those
> back, I added my nick to the message. The list thus may change over time.
>
> Paul
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: