Hi intrigeri, On 25-10-2020 19:44, intrigeri wrote: > This being said, this was a while ago, and I wonder if the problem got > somehow fixed in one of those packages in the meantime. Could you > please give it another try with 2.13.5-1 (sid) or 3.0.0-1 > (experimental), and ideally both? This would establish an updated > baseline for further investigation. Scheduled on amd64. Note however that I reported that the test didn't always fail, so if it passes, it's not saying for sure that everything is OK. >>> Is there a better way for me to investigate? > >> We have given DD's temporarily access to one of our workers before. If >> you're interested we could do that again for this case. That way you >> could even skip the upload to experimental, assuming it reproduces if >> run from a local tree. And you can check what's going on in the test bed. > > This looks great. I'd like to do this once the updated baseline is > established, if it still fails. I could book time for this on Nov > 28-29. Can you can already point me at your public key? Easiest is with a signed e-mail, but if it's otherwise easily traceable it's from you, I can take it from elsewhere. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature