[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#970335: ecl breaks cffi autopkgtest: Don't know how to REQUIRE rt..



Source: ecl, cffi
Control: found -1 ecl/20.4.24+ds-1
Control: found -1 cffi/1:0.22.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of ecl the autopkgtest of cffi fails in testing
when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of ecl from
unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular
form:

                       pass            fail
ecl                    from testing    20.4.24+ds-1
cffi                   from testing    1:0.22.1-1
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of ecl to testing
[1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against
both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the
bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ecl

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/c/cffi/7008137/log.gz

;;; Compiling
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/bordeaux-threads/src/impl-ecl.lisp.
;;; OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=0, Speed=3, Debug=0
;;;
;;; End of Pass 1.
;;; Finished compiling
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/bordeaux-threads/src/impl-ecl.lisp.
;;;
;;;
;;; Compiling
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/bordeaux-threads/src/default-implementations.lisp.
;;; OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=0, Speed=3, Debug=0
;;;
;;; End of Pass 1.
;;; Finished compiling
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/bordeaux-threads/src/default-implementations.lisp.
;;;
An error occurred during initialization:
Module error: Don't know how to REQUIRE rt..

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: