Hi Christian, On 06-09-2020 13:17, Christian Kastner wrote: > I looked into this again, and my suspicion is that the autopkgtest > maintainers might more be suited to solve this. Hmm, most autopkgtest maintainers are not so well into details as the original authors and maintainers aren't active anymore. > Now if I understand this correctly, runcmd is a helper that, at first > glance, was designed for one-shot commands, rather than interactive > commands, so no matter what I feed to --finished-build-commands, it's > not possible to get interactive shell. I don't know. autopkgtest has an option to request interactive shell: either --shell or --shell-fail. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature