On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:06:59PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 14-04-2019 22:57, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > On 15372 March 1977, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> b) If the access is indeed set-upped via IP whitelisting, than I have > >> the following concern. We are currently running 12 amd64 workers in the > >> AWS framework. I am typically recreating workers after 60 to 90 days as > >> we are having issues with them after a while. This means they get new IP > >> addresses. Would that be a problem? Soon I hope to also have arm64 > >> workers from another platform available. I expect similar issues there. > > > > Thats bad, as yes, it is entirely via IP. > > We manage the instances via rake and our configuration is in git, > available on salsa [1]. Does that help in any way, or can we think of > something? perhaps we could get a separate node to act as proxy (maybe even the master node itself), and then we would only need to whitelist the proxy instead of every (new) worker node.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature