[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#946309: golang-github-getlantern-errors: autopkgtest failure on arm64: amd64 specific references



Source: golang-github-getlantern-errors
Version: 0.0~git20190325.abdb3e3-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression

Dear maintainers,

With a recent upload of golang-github-getlantern-errors your package
added an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on arm64. I copied some
of the output at the bottom of this report. It seems this test was only
meant for amd64.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
you please investigate the situation and fix it?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1]
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=golang-github-getlantern-errors

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/g/golang-github-getlantern-errors/3456222/log.gz

        	            	Diff:
        	            	--- Expected
        	            	+++ Actual
        	            	@@ -3,3 +3,3 @@
        	            	   at testing.tRunner (testing.go:999)
        	            	-  at runtime.goexit (asm_amd999.s:999)
        	            	+  at runtime.goexit (asm_arm999.s:999)
        	            	 Caused by: World
        	            	@@ -8,3 +8,3 @@
        	            	   at testing.tRunner (testing.go:999)
        	            	-  at runtime.goexit (asm_amd999.s:999)
        	            	+  at runtime.goexit (asm_arm999.s:999)
        	            	 Caused by: orld
        	            	@@ -16,3 +16,3 @@
        	            	   at testing.tRunner (testing.go:999)
        	            	-  at runtime.goexit (asm_amd999.s:999)
        	            	+  at runtime.goexit (asm_arm999.s:999)
        	            	 Caused by: d
        	Test:       	TestNewWithCause

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: