[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)



Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"):
> I think it _is_ optional.  At least, it was in adt-run.  I think
> autopkgtest has much of the same logic.  It's a question of putting
> together the right rune to specify what you want.

I am wrong.  autopkgtest has a completely different command line
parser to adt-run.

 https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.1.en.html
 https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/autopkgtest/adt-run.1.en.html

adt-run's command line is a bit abstruse but I think it is more
powerful.  Unfortunately adt-run was deleted.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.



Reply to: