Re: Bug#908757: r-cran-processx: autopkgtest regression

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#908757: r-cran-processx: autopkgtest regression"):
> On 18-09-18 14:23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > How about a table:
> > 
> > The recent upload of r-cran-processx seems to have introduced a
> > regression:
> > 
> >                      passing                   failing
> > 
> >   r-cran-processx    <version>                 <version>
> >    autopkgtest       (currenlty in testing)    (currently in unstable)
> > 
> >   r-cran-processx    <version>                 <version>
> >    binary packages   (currenlty in testing)    (currently in unstable)
> 
> The two above should nowadays be in sync, so that is not the issue. If
> they are not in sync, I'll never file a bug report.

But the reader may not know that.

> >   some-dependency    <version>                 <version>
> >    binary package    (currenlty in testing)    (currently in unstable)
> > 
> >   other packages     those from testing        those from testing
> > 
> > or something ?

To put it another way, I think the existing prose representation is
trying to present and contrast a fairly complicated pair of
situations.  A more structured representation can help.

Thanks,
Ian.