Re: which locale? plz clarify me
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999 04:11:59 +0800
Anthony Wong <hajime@asunaro.dhs.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 12:54:50AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> |which one to use? plz?
> |zh_CN.GB2312 as found in kde and many more, or
> |zh_CN.EUC as found in TurboLinux-CN, or
> |zh as found in XFree86, or
> |zh_CN and zh_TW like others been found in glibc/locale.alias?
> |
> |and why? which one's debian's prefer? plz clarify me.... sleepy.....
>
> Currently zh_CN.GB2312 should be the one that's used the most
> extensively in Debian, although there are often problems
> here and there. Personally I'm waiting for the locales support
> in glibc to stablize, as I know they are making a new repertoiremap,
> and so the GB locales may need to be rewritten soon (although I'm
> not 100% sure). I forsee that there'll also be GBK in glibc as
> things proceed.
GB2312¬O²Å¦XEUCªº¡A¦]¦¹¦bLC_CTYPE¤è±¡A¨âªÌ¬OÝ®eªº¡C
LC_MESSAGE¤Wn¦b¨âªÌ¤§¶¡¤Á´«¤]¤£¬O¤°¤\¤j°ÝÃD¡C
¦ý¬OGB2312¬Ý°_¨Ó¬O¤@Ó¤w¸g¹L®Éªº¼Ðã¡C·s¼Ðã¬OGB13000(GBK)¡A
¦ý¬OGBK¤£Ý®e EUC¡A³o¼Ëì¨Ó¬°EUC³]pªº¤@¨ÇªF¦è´Nn§ï¡C
glibc2.1¨½ªºeuc-cn.c©Mgb2312.c³£¤£¯à¥Î¦bGBK¤W¡CTurboLinux 4.0¨½
ªºglibc-2.1.1-4.SRPM¡A¨ä¤¤¦³¤@Ópatch´N¬Ogbkªºiconv module¡C
§Ú«e¤Ñèµ¹Ulrich Drepper¼g«H½Í¨ì³oÓ°ÝÃD¡C¥L»¡³oÓpatch¥L¦´N®³¨ì¤F¡A
p¦E¦b2.2ª©¥[¤J¤º¸m§¹¾ãªº¦UºØ¦h¦r¸`locale¤ä«ù¡A2.1ª©¥u׸ɡA¤£°µ
¤j°Ê§@¤F¡Afaint¡O*¡I¡]¡^#¢w¡O¡]*¡I#¢w¢w¡K¡K*#¡]¡O
>
> As I don't want to rush for a temporary solution, I'm not doing
> much work in improving a better GB environment. I would rather
> look for opportunities to help glibc to achieve what they think as
> the 'right way to do'.
> Of course, anyone who is willing to persue this can send bug reports
> to appropriate developers :)
>
--
Best Regards
Adoal Xu
--
[ This mail was originally sent to debian-simplified-chinese@lists.debian.org ]
[ and was forwarded to this list automatically. GB characters are also converted ]
[ to Big5 at the same time. Note that there may be errors during the conversion ]
[ as this is not done by a human! ]
Reply to: