[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: which locale? plz clarify me



On Thu, 7 Oct 1999 04:11:59 +0800
Anthony Wong <hajime@asunaro.dhs.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 12:54:50AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> |which one to use? plz?
> |zh_CN.GB2312 as found in kde and many more, or
> |zh_CN.EUC as found in TurboLinux-CN, or
> |zh as found in XFree86, or
> |zh_CN and zh_TW like others been found in glibc/locale.alias?
> |
> |and why? which one's debian's prefer? plz clarify me.... sleepy.....
> 
> Currently zh_CN.GB2312 should be the one that's used the most
> extensively in Debian, although there are often problems 
> here and there. Personally I'm waiting for the locales support
> in glibc to stablize, as I know they are making a new repertoiremap,
> and so the GB locales may need to be rewritten soon (although I'm
> not 100% sure). I forsee that there'll also be GBK in glibc as
> things proceed.
GB2312¬O²Å¦XEUCªº¡A¦]¦¹¦bLC_CTYPE¤è­±¡A¨âªÌ¬O­Ý®eªº¡C
LC_MESSAGE¤W­n¦b¨âªÌ¤§¶¡¤Á´«¤]¤£¬O¤°¤\¤j°ÝÃD¡C
¦ý¬OGB2312¬Ý°_¨Ó¬O¤@­Ó¤w¸g¹L®Éªº¼Ð­ã¡C·s¼Ð­ã¬OGB13000(GBK)¡A
¦ý¬OGBK¤£­Ý®e EUC¡A³o¼Ë­ì¨Ó¬°EUC³]­pªº¤@¨ÇªF¦è´N­n§ï¡C
glibc2.1¨½ªºeuc-cn.c©Mgb2312.c³£¤£¯à¥Î¦bGBK¤W¡CTurboLinux 4.0¨½
ªºglibc-2.1.1-4.SRPM¡A¨ä¤¤¦³¤@­Ópatch´N¬Ogbkªºiconv module¡C
§Ú«e¤Ñ­èµ¹Ulrich Drepper¼g«H½Í¨ì³o­Ó°ÝÃD¡C¥L»¡³o­Ópatch¥L¦­´N®³¨ì¤F¡A
­p¦E¦b2.2ª©¥[¤J¤º¸m§¹¾ãªº¦UºØ¦h¦r¸`locale¤ä«ù¡A2.1ª©¥u­×¸É¡A¤£°µ
¤j°Ê§@¤F¡Afaint¡O*¡I¡]¡^#¢w¡O¡]*¡I#¢w¢w¡K¡K*#¡]¡O

> 
> As I don't want to rush for a temporary solution, I'm not doing
> much work in improving a better GB environment. I would rather
> look for opportunities to help glibc to achieve what they think as
> the 'right way to do'.
> Of course, anyone who is willing to persue this can send bug reports
> to appropriate developers :)
> 


--

Best Regards

Adoal Xu


-- 
[ This  mail  was originally  sent to  debian-simplified-chinese@lists.debian.org ]
[ and was forwarded to this list automatically.  GB characters are also converted ]
[ to Big5 at the same time.  Note that there may be errors  during the conversion ]
[ as this is not done by a human!                                                 ]


Reply to: