2008/5/19 Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) <
fourdollars@gmail.com>:
> To li xin:
>
> 這位內地的朋友, 不好意思, 您都已經直接寄到小弟的信箱中了, 小弟只有被強迫閱讀簡體的感覺, 您不應該直接寄到小弟的信箱中.
> 若您是寄到 mailing list 上面那另當別論囉~ 麻煩您將您的言論及意見直接寄到 mailing list 上面好嗎? 好讓大家知道您的意見及感受.
>
> 2008/5/19 li xin <
xinligg@gmail.com>:
>> 问题不大啊~你可以只看繁体的，就和现在一样；简体你不习惯可以不看，如同这篇。
>>
>> 2008/5/19 Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) <
fourdollars@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> 小弟習慣看繁體字
>>> 在閱讀簡體字上有困難
>>> 因此反對合併
>>>
>>> 2008/4/30 Kanru Chen <
koster@debian.org.tw>:
>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> I think we should respect the opinions from who are actually using the
>>>> lists, so I forward this mail to the lists.
>>>>
>>>> 2008/4/30 Andrew Lee <
andrew@linux.org.tw>:
>>>>> Dear folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Foka went on IRC and ask for merge debian-chinese-big5 and
>>>>> debian-chinese-gb into one mailing list. Please check the log for
>>>>> details or read these(I copied from my log) below:
>>>>>
>>>>> 01:56 < foka> 我最近有個想法：如果把 debian-chinese-big5 和
>>>>> debian-chinese-gb
>>>>> 二合為一，大家看法如何？ :-)
>>>>> 01:57 < aguai> foka: 不懂？
>>>>> 01:57 < paulliu> 唔...為啥要做這件事??..:P
>>>>> 01:57 < paulliu> aguai, 那是兩個 mailing list
>>>>> 01:58 < foka> paulliu, 是這樣的：現在都是 UTF-8 年代了，也不再存在以前
>>>>> Big5、GB2312 郵件亂碼的問題了。
>>>>> 01:58 < paulliu> 嗯, 的確...不過我是這麼想的...其實那個 big5 的意思應該是
>>>>> chinese-traditional
>>>>> 01:59 < paulliu> 雖然大家都是中國人...不過繁體跟簡體..還是會有一些閱讀上
>>>>> 的困擾..
>>>>> 02:01 < paulliu> 不過, debian-chinese-big5 沒有甚麼 traffic 就是了..
>>>>> 02:01 < paulliu> 當然這只是我的看法而已啦..
>>>>> 02:01 < paulliu> 我是覺得, 繁體中文跟簡體中文, 有時是該分開的...
>>>>> 02:02 < foka> 其實整體來說還好；我認識好多台灣來的朋友，很快熟識簡體字
>>>>> 了。大陸朋友看繁體字，倒也不是問題，只是寫不出來而已。
>>>>> 02:02 < paulliu> 是可以看的懂, 但是我自己的經驗是...偶爾要猜...
>>>>> 02:03 < foka> paulliu, 呵呵，正好互相學習。 :-)
>>>>> 02:03 < paulliu> 也許簡體中文猜中意思的機率是 9x%, 日文漢字 4x%......
>>>>>
>>>>> Debian do have lists for different languages. I think it's easier for
>>>>> support our users. Cause they can use their mother language to ask
>>>>> question and got answer by the mother language. We have separately lists
>>>>> because long time ago, we have encoding difference problem on big5 and
>>>>> gb2312, so that we have two lists for Chinese.
>>>>>
>>>>> But my opinion now Debian is a global community, it is not specfic for
>>>>> any nation or racism. Who use traditional or simplified Chinese are
>>>>> equal participant.
>>>>>
>>>>> But everyone can has opinion. Paulliu said that traditional and
>>>>> simplified Chinese are all Chinese, which I agreed. And Paulliu also
>>>>> think traditional and simplified Chinese should be separate.
>>>>>
>>>>> However the point I concerned is our users support and free software
>>>>> community.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'd like to ask, what's you guys' opinion:
>>>>> Does our community only limited in Taiwan or China?
>>>>> Do you guys agree people from over the world can be also part of Debian
>>>>> community?
>>>>> You guys prefer to do the user support together or separately, and why?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please give your valuable opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kindest regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ~ Kanru Chen <
koster@debian.org.tw>
>>>> 'v'
http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/~kanru.96/
>>>> // \\ GnuPG-Key ID: 365CC7A2
>>>> /( )\ Fingerprint: 3278 DFB4 BB28 6E8C 9E1F 1ECB B1B7 5B5F 365C C7A2
>>>> ^`~'^
>>>>
>>>
>>
>