[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re:_倡议:_发到这个_ 列表都使用_U TF-8_编码



合并吧
----- 收到以下来信内容 -----  
发件人:  Anthony Wong  
收件人:  debian-chinese-gb  
时  间: 2005-03-17, 11:18:32 
主  题: Re:_倡议:_发到这个_ 列表都使用_U TF-8_编码 




>是的,当天我们和Andrew Lee, Rex 
>Tsai等讨论的的结果是把这两个list合并成一个debian-chinese,然后在server把无论是big5或者gb的email都转成UTF-8才发出去。不知道大家觉得这样做好不好,还是要分开简体和繁(正)体两个list? 
> 
>Anthony 
> 
> 
>On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:06:34 +0800, Ling Li  wrote: 
>> Asia Mini Conf & CodeFest 的时候提过这个问题的,当时大家的想法是把-gb和-big 
>> 合并起来,然后都用UTF-8的编码。好像在场的所有人都同意,不过后来可能太忙就没 
>> 有搞了。 
>>  
>> 用gb和utf-8混合,还是经常会有问题的,所以最好都用UTF-8。 
>>  
>> 李凌 3.17 
>>  
>> * SuperMMX  [2005-03-17 09:14:54 +0800]: 
>>  
>> > 
>> > 很早就有这个想法了, 虽然大家使用邮件客户端看 GB2312 编码的邮件 
>> > 是没有问题的, 但是在 Debian 的 Mailling List Archive 中, 用 GB2312 
>> > 编码的邮件标题就不能直接看到了, 有时候在网上看起来还是很方便的. 
>> > 
>> > 大家觉得呢? 
>> > 
>> > BTW, 上面有两封邮件, 我这里看到是乱码, 一封是 sleepdragon 的, 
>> > 另外一封是 Shixin Zeng 的, 大家能看到吗? 第二个估计是好的, 
>> > 可能是我的邮件客户端的问题. 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > http://SuperMMX.org  自由世界 Free Software World 
>> > 
>> > The Least Successful Collector 
>> >       Betsy Baker played a central role in the history of collecting.  She 
>> > was employed as a servant in the house of John Warburton (1682-1759) who had 
>> > amassed a fine collection of 58 first edition plays, including most of the 
>> > works of Shakespeare. 
>> >       One day Warburton returned home to find 55 of them charred beyond 
>> > legibility.  Betsy had either burned them or used them as pie bottoms.  The 
>> > remaining three folios are now in the British Museum. 
>> >       The only comparable literary figure was the maid who in 1835 burned 
>> > the manuscript of the first volume of Thomas Carlyle's "The Hisory of the 
>> > French Revolution", thinking it was wastepaper. 
>> >               -- Stephen Pile, "The Book of Heroic Failures" 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-chinese-gb-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
>> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org 
>> > 
>> > 
>>  
>>  
>> 
> 
>

Reply to: