Re: Arphic Font 问题
Yu Guanghui wrote:
>hi
> 我想是mozilla 0.99用了抗锯齿的关系吧。
>
耶...那我比较好奇的是,当我们用xtt这个module来显示ttf的字型,
系统的效率比较高一点,反观用freetype比较慢。
难道mozilla在编译的过程或是code的本身是用别的方式来撰写的吗?
>
>
> Yu Guanghui
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Wan Hing Wah [mailto:50191914@uxmail.cityu.edu.hk]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:12 PM
>>To: Anthony Fok
>>Cc: Hilary Cheng; debian-chinese-big5@lists.debian.org
>>Subject: Re: Arphic Font 问题
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Anthony Fok wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:11:40AM +0800, Hilary Cheng wrote:
>>>
>>>>各位好:
>>>>小弟昨晚安装unstable mozilla 0.99.1 debian package.发觉用了
>>>>
>>freetype的
>>
>>>>mozilla,Arphic 的明体比Xft的
>>>>Arphic 明体清楚很多,这个是否Xft的问题?
>>>>
>>>愿闻其详。有没有 screenshots? :-)
>>>
>>> 东东
>>>
>>seem OK for me
>>
>>http://www.ee.cityu.edu.hk/~50191914/chinese.png
>>
>>gedit one is Xft, mozilla one if freetype
>>
>>--
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-chinese-big5-request@lists.debian.org
>>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>>listmaster@lists.debian.org
>>
>>
>>
>
--
------ 阿信 ------
Welcome To Debian World!!
http://www.debian.org/
SeXyDebian启动中...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-chinese-big5-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
| This message was re-posted from debian-chinese-big5@lists.debian.org
| and converted from big5 to gb2312 by an automatic gateway.
Reply to: