[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Birthday Party in Taiwan, possible?



  Not the new motoweb release, but new Debian release. :)

regards
-Rex

Andrew Lee wrote on 08/11/2009 08:55 PM:
> Dear Debian folks in Taiwan,
> 
> Just had a conversation(see below) with chihchun on IRC and confirmed
> that they(he with the motoweb team) won't have time for Debian Birthday
> Party this month. But they will cook ideas for local community, which
> will be discussed at the event for the new motoweb release in the end of
> this year.
> 
> 19:27 < AndrewLee> chihchun: BTW, any info for the Debian Birthday Party
> this year?
> 19:28 < chihchun> AndrewLee: paused, motoweb team like to have release
> party at end of this year
> 19:28 < DreamerC> Debian Birthday Party this year. Does anyone have any
> idea?
> 19:28 < AndrewLee> chihchun: what release party at end of this year?
> 19:29 < AndrewLee> chihchun: a new motoweb?
> 19:29 < chihchun> DreamerC: you and AndrewLee may hold the event, if you
> are available. :)
> 19:29 < chihchun> AndrewLee: No, the others don't have time for DBP this
> month
> 19:30 < AndrewLee> chihchun: got it.
> 19:30 < chihchun> AndrewLee: and we had some ideas about local
> community, which will be discussed at the event for the new release
> 19:30 < chihchun> we means the motoweb team
> 19:30 < chihchun> currently , there are no really plan but idea. the
> plan might be cooked in next few months
> 
> Thanks to the motoweb team. They organized and contributed to Debian
> Birthday Party for many years in the past.
> 
> I really enjoyed in DBP before and would like to *volunteer* for DBP in
> Taiwan this year as I'd like to share a special version of Debian which
> I bring back from DebConf9.
> 
> But I don't want to be the only one who would like to have DBP this
> year. So please drop me a message by mail or IRC or anything if you want
> to have DBP this year as well.
> 
> Let's see if the super cow power exist in Taiwan or not? :D
> 
> -Andrew
> 
> 


Reply to: