Re: CJK workers, throw off you chains! (fwd)
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jonathan Chang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:46:41AM -0500, Thomas Chan wrote:
> > Perhaps some of us would be interested in proofing the new unihan.txt
> > file for Unicode 3.1?
>
> 如何proof unihan呢？我比較注意的是Unihan的最後加了不少CNS 11643-1992
> 的字，我猜這些字也都在CCCII裡面。可能的話應該把CCCII的碼也補上去。
Well, there are problem areas, such as none of the Plane 2 characters
having any radical or stroke information, or volume/page references to
large dictionaries.
I don't know who else is interested in CCCII mappings, but there isn't
much time--3.1 will be released at the end of March. CCCII mappings are
also problematic, because source separation has been abandoned. (You can
see some CNS 11643 and HKSCS compatibility characters at U+2F800 ..
U+2FA1D, though.)
> # TF CNS 11643-1992, plane 15
This is a good example of something that needs to be proofed--does plane
15 really exist in the 1992 edition of CNS 11643, or only the 1986
edition?
Thomas Chan
tc31@cornell.edu
Reply to: