Accepted pngcheck 3.0.3-1~deb11u1 (source) into proposed-updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 17:54:41 +0100
Source: pngcheck
Architecture: source
Version: 3.0.3-1~deb11u1
Distribution: bullseye-security
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David da Silva Polverari <david.polverari@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Moritz <jmm@debian.org>
Closes: 1021278
Changes:
pngcheck (3.0.3-1~deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for stable, pretty much all of the changes since 2.3.0
are security fixes, besides CVE-2020-35511, there's also several
without CVE IDs assigned. Upstream dropped the -f option as a
security fix, as such it's also missing in this upload (Closes: #1021278)
Checksums-Sha1:
2da125fa77fea2f321b257275f9c89fa2de632fa 1925 pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1.dsc
e6a6724395874d29e61bd03e98c1b302ddccd17e 63766 pngcheck_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz
8f94d1d1f06de0fb3dd86862834c3b8e272372cc 15288 pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1.debian.tar.xz
46114acd2e7b39a57dabc9cd1e1ebbfd3784055c 5807 pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
b38a3e5cbd64ac80a88c37fa15c514322360f0af735a4c6637604adb9f107ef6 1925 pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1.dsc
c36a4491634af751f7798ea421321642f9590faa032eccb0dd5fb4533609dee6 63766 pngcheck_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz
7e52e8648cdc5e238e2469393aebb982d3c5bbc84ad75ca70cc28e9037962a3c 15288 pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1.debian.tar.xz
ce9b45fa61c73875978e30b3d35ddb980ae5b74189a206381abb8164afa98e7f 5807 pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1_source.buildinfo
Files:
b76973b62bd563a3300069bed7ca99e9 1925 graphics optional pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1.dsc
ac3fe8c134c16e8dec2db2bf60e2b2f2 63766 graphics optional pngcheck_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz
205fe83f0fba2e9b1321f3490e64d560 15288 graphics optional pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1.debian.tar.xz
76531b10defc42f3402d39ff1b0e1ac5 5807 graphics optional pngcheck_3.0.3-1~deb11u1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=tyjV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: