[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted opendmarc 1.3.2-6+deb10u2 (source) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 13:36:57 +0530
Source: opendmarc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.2-6+deb10u2
Distribution: buster
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Changed-By: Utkarsh Gupta <utkarsh@debian.org>
Closes: 966464
Changes:
 opendmarc (1.3.2-6+deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload by the LTS team.
   * In opendmarc_xml_parse(), ensure NULL-termination of the buffer passed.
     (Fixes: CVE-2020-12460) (Closes: #966464)
Checksums-Sha1:
 68d2876a96d69bd92419164ad5eb0e7959f8772e 2116 opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2.dsc
 dd7deac10966094735a32c0df6631898d59db603 593448 opendmarc_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 3b6b7cc9fc38b092421c92b9129b44cf15ef968d 26368 opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2.debian.tar.xz
 24812791e04b268e403acf0ff60221823defa2a5 5959 opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 01bbc277f75990cf2b964fa27674d6839d545bd07261a44a297f9d7b1635dc7e 2116 opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2.dsc
 213c4b01a9ff5dcdf331f7bd1dd6a382077abbf8ee9111852f2101ec917c2ffb 593448 opendmarc_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 9b376f127b8374ff3cf029fd2a534d759f2eda67d468c7809a2d1bd59e8f5ffa 26368 opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2.debian.tar.xz
 f2dfade03d61dc4a35dc2c500a01969568624b53ab95ce8e878e243219f964e7 5959 opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 8d330fd95f7419635d260eccb6185ce3 2116 mail optional opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2.dsc
 2b4e9b8be7fe61800515cef1d7e6a905 593448 mail optional opendmarc_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 f58d35ee443675cc2aa5d65a226a414a 26368 mail optional opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2.debian.tar.xz
 0f6f618a38275dc458d204dd8d14d225 5959 mail optional opendmarc_1.3.2-6+deb10u2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=HbqJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: