Accepted binutils-mingw-w64 2+deb7u1 (source all amd64) into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:32:41 +0100
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Binary: binutils-mingw-w64 binutils-mingw-w64-i686 binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2+deb7u1
Distribution: wheezy-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>
Description:
binutils-mingw-w64 - Cross-binutils for Win32 and Win64 using MinGW-w64
binutils-mingw-w64-i686 - Cross-binutils for Win32 (x86) using MinGW-w64
binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64 - Cross-binutils for Win64 (x64) using MinGW-w64
Closes: 775165
Changes:
binutils-mingw-w64 (2+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
.
* Rebuild against binutils 2.22-8+deb7u2 to fix CVE-2014-8484,
CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503,
CVE-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738 (Closes: #775165).
Checksums-Sha1:
2534e3e1038ef48ba3b7989846a831d669fa5ed2 1866 binutils-mingw-w64_2+deb7u1.dsc
075acd9ae3f9c5fc54b7e182760d17fbbb7434af 4172 binutils-mingw-w64_2+deb7u1.tar.gz
407de20f086445601af983a500eb6404931d743e 124888 binutils-mingw-w64_2.22-8+deb7u2+2+deb7u1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
b9f3f16b5af46c10dcbd81b7b81ef708b89663c8edf5a47b3c1e88a7a16ae7be 1866 binutils-mingw-w64_2+deb7u1.dsc
3663033021304d2abdb6ceff5c379ff187251c0fe40a8b4309a6f7849a3faa82 4172 binutils-mingw-w64_2+deb7u1.tar.gz
d0dc43665cfdfa48ce5a7bdb25566ed095c6bc61d51bd539193e019526616e87 124888 binutils-mingw-w64_2.22-8+deb7u2+2+deb7u1_all.deb
Files:
148302dc15fb2bf242321cfe57ade3e4 1866 devel extra binutils-mingw-w64_2+deb7u1.dsc
a1d92ef0bfdc31d732a6d173d3489852 4172 devel extra binutils-mingw-w64_2+deb7u1.tar.gz
b0f3374138a60a817e63fe750036eee7 124888 devel extra binutils-mingw-w64_2.22-8+deb7u2+2+deb7u1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=tl2W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: