idled 1.16-5 uploaded
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 21:39:55 -0800
Source: idled
Binary: idled
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.16-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>
Description:
idled - Idle Daemon. Removes idle users.
Changes:
idled (1.16-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Configuration file idled.cf had some wrong values
Files:
afa349e9585253e2a3009252fc0d0c11 613 non-free optional idled_1.16-5.dsc
4f82c58e2530c12253e234332b491aa2 9784 non-free optional idled_1.16-5.diff.gz
5a13e6c60924b3c4283f6fd6707091f2 44620 non-free optional idled_1.16-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMogQI8Dlhlk39XChAQF2XAQArDOB1L05C8as68chZr4yCo2/UzjTGzYk
hgmlNZy6RzfyF63S348wfecjuEQlCE6xyaGhdU3LnLYrS22G6rsOknZDLGjXWk2x
uGYVLPKOZY/g1evVAh9Q+ttXn8y4zp5k+sxVE1wHcHUgl7sbrps95LCsuTeegRoE
e0j6npcf9A4=
=VLxw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From miss
Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 1996 08:13:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 19769 invoked from smtpd); 12 Nov 1996 07:59:43 -0000
Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO master.debian.org) (bruce@206.139.73.13)
by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 1996 07:59:36 -0000
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 08:58:56 +0100 (MET)
From: Juergen Menden <menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: The Future of Debian TeX
In-Reply-To: <199611112220.JAA14379@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961112085730.11638D-100000@koma.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"VVps22.0.Qr1.663Yo"@master.debian.org>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/2891
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Priority: non-urgent
Importance: low
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 12 Nov 1996, Stuart Lamble wrote:
>
> >BASE: kpathsea, mfbase (was mfbasfnt, mfbin, mflib), texbase (was texbin,
> >texlib, textfm)
>
> Just wondering...were/are texlib and textfm (for example) architecture-
> independant?
they are. also mfbasfnt and mflib.
> If so, it may be worthwhile keeping them split out of texbase,
> as it means there is less duplication between the various arch-dependant
> directories.
> ('Course, if they're fairly small, this argument falls down :)
they are not.
jjm
--
Juergen Menden | Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by me,
tel: +49 (89) 289 - 22387 +-----------+ are (usually) not the opinions
e-mail: menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de | of anyone else on this planet.
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: