[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian images on Microsoft Azure cloud

On 2015-11-16 15:59:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:

> > Regardless, I still think you should state the requirement in terms of
> > the result, not in terms of how it's built. The "import image" thing was
> > just an (arguably bad) example; but I can imagine other cases where
> > things "have" to be built on the cloud provider's infrastructure, in the
> > sense that for practical reasons it's the best way forward, but that it
> > isn't theoretically the only possible way of doing so.
> > 
> > In that light, I think a requirement that it be *possible* to build a
> > bit-for-bit identical image while outside the given cloud infrastructure
> > (even if for whatever practical reason we end up not doing so) makes
> > much more sense. 
> Then we do agree. That's what I wanted to write.

Yey, so we reached consensus in this at last :-)

Build wherever you want just make it reproducible.

|_|0|_|                                          |
|_|_|0|         "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam"          |
|0|0|0|         -------- kuLa ---------          |

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3
3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD  58C3 38B3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: