On Tuesday 10 January 2012 23:58:56 Rick Thomas wrote: > On Monday 09 January 2012 20:23:30 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > To my understanding, Andrei objected a sentence about Defect > > Management, > > On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:34 PM, George Danchev wrote: > > Okay, Andrei objected the term "checkreading", and it is indeed not > > appropriate, regardless of whether it is performed by the drive > > itself or by > > the user, therefore "proofreading" is suggested instead. > > I'm not an expert on optical recording technology, but I am a native > English speaker. To me, the term "proofreading" implies checking > someone's written words for grammar, sense, and spelling. It's really > not something I would expect a computer to be able to do. If it's > officially called "defect management", why not use that term -- > especially since (at least in English) it actually describes what's > really going on. > > If it were my choice (which, of course, it's not) I would greatly > prefer something closer to Andre's original suggestion: > > "In order to get full nominal speed on BD-RE (without the slowdown > caused by the drive's internal defect management) add > the option 'stream_recording=on'." I'm now glad Steve as picked yours, in fact. > Thanks for listening, Thanks for communicating your data point. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.