[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dak and the debian infrastructure

[ Note Reply-To: set, we're wandering off-topic here ]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:45:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:46:45AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Sven Luther wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:34:19PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> I don't think any thing is actually "hidden". If you mean "not packaged",
>> >> autobuilder comes to mind, but a part of autobuilder (namely sbuild) is
>> >> already in the archive.
>> >
>> >or debian-cd, where only one person can usually use it with one precise
>> >infrastructure in mind to build the debian isos.
>> Pardon?
>I know nobody excpt manty which is able to reproduce the builds of the
>weekly/daily debian-cd thingies, and the debian-cd used to build them is
>highly dependent on the archive organisation of the box on which it runs.

Well, I'm producing sarge CDs on a weekly basis too, just not public
ones at the moment. I've also made several sets of woodyrX CDs
recently. Debian-cd may be a minority package, as it has a very large
dependency (a mirror), but there are quite a few people using it
successfully. It's not easy to use (and quite probably never will be)
as it's a very specialised piece of software. There are substantial
changes waiting for after the sarge release, not least the huge
performance increase from my own JTE code. Please feel free to join in
discussion on the debian-cd list if you have suggestions for other

Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: