AMD64 CDs (was Re: New method for Packages/Sources file updates)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: AMD64 CDs (was Re: New method for Packages/Sources file updates)
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:45:35 +0000
- Message-id: <E1CZ8Jz-0002YK-8Z@sledge.mossbank.org.uk>
- Reply-to: debian-cd@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87zn0z4h0u.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- References: <874qje80i5.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20041125143847.GK30627@mails.so.argh.org> <20041125143847.GK30627@mails.so.argh.org> <E1CXNZc-0006S3-Qg@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <E1CXNZc-0006S3-Qg@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <E1CYlZm-00037P-Ak@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <E1CYlZm-00037P-Ak@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <E1CZ6pF-00020P-DZ@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <E1CZ6pF-00020P-DZ@sledge.mossbank.org.uk>
Adding Reply-To: debian-cd, this part of the discussion is better off there.
Goswin writes:
>Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> writes:
>
>> In article <87k6s360uq.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> you write:
>>>Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> writes:
>>>
>>>1. What does the archive layout intrest you? You should be using the
>>>dir/file and filenames fields in the Sources/Packages file. If you
>>>need I can give you a simple shell script that extracts them quite
>>>efficiently.
>>
>> You'd hope that, yes. Almost all the code in debian-cd copes just
>> fine, but there are a couple of changes I've had to make for
>> amd64. Reviewing the diff:
>
>Is the patch on your homepage or similar? I would like to setup a
>daily D-I netinstall build with debian-cd once the core debs and udebs
>are all there (and prioritize any missing ones).
>
>The current script to create the netinstall cd I use works but doesn't
>give the same result (like docs, help texts, ... on the CD).
I've got a fairly old diff right now. I'll merge it forward and post a
diff later today - I have somebody asking me for amd64 CDs so I need
to do it anyway.
>> * the generated docs and task lists don't list amd64 yet
>> * tools/scanpackages needs to be educated about pool/unstable/$SECT
>> in addition to pool/$SECT
>
>Right, for the files lists. But that looks like a minor change that can
>be easily reversed in about a week when the new structure is fully
>populated.
Yes, easily.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Mature Sporty Personal
More Innovation More Adult
A Man in Dandism
Powered Midship Specialty
Reply to: