OK, so we've had positive reports for i386 & ia64, and no negative reports so far. Should I just assume that all the DVDs that I succeed in building (which is still missing a few) are OK, and sign them, or do people think we should wait for success reports independently for each arch? BTW Lance, you've grabbed these, haven't you --- have you tried testing the DVDs you're planning on burning? I wouldn't want to sign of the source DVDs only to find they're broken in some way. I know you noticed the sarge...Sources thing, but that file's different from the Woody one in only a few apparently irrelevant lines, so I wouldn't think it was worth re-doing the images for that, but I'd like to hear that the disk comes out readable before you get thousands of the things pressed. Cheers, Phil. -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part