On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 23:53, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > (Note that the support for multi-image .jigdo files does NOT mean that I think > this is a good idea. The only useful application I see is the merging of two > almost-exactly-the-same .jigdo files into one, but I doubt that this will be > done in practice. It's just that _if_ someone _ever_ would decide to do such a > (IMHO) Bad Thing, jigdo-easy can handle it. And far more user-friendly than > intended, too ;-) Oh, OK --- I thought it was quite a good idea to merge the 1 and 1_NONUS jigdo files. Was I wrong? I was looking at the format, thinking "Hm, I wonder if that'll work" and planning on giving it a try tommorow. Cheers, Phil. -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part