On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:14, Chris Lawrence wrote: > Yes, it is ISOLINUX-based, not MULTIBOOT. It just got attached to > this thread because that's where Raphael mentioned that I was going to > work on it. Just tried this -- If one tries an install of the bf24 kernel, when you get to the "Configure Device Driver Modules", it's obviously not taking account of the kernel it was booted with, but is unpacking the modules for 2.2.20. If one flips to tty2, mounts the CD, unpacks /mnt/.../disks-i386/current/bf24/drivers.tgz (or whatever) into /target and run the install.sh by hand, it will then proceed. Presumably the scripts on the boot floppy know which kernel they belong to, and so the ISOLINUX approach is either going to need some changes to those scripts, or needs to have all the various coppies and a mechanism for making the right one gets launched. That's probably enough to mean that it's Multiboot, or nothing this time around. Cheers, Phil. -- Say no to software patents! http://petition.eurolinux.org/ |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part