[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: .raw extension is misleading

On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:

> I could add an entry to the CD FAQ, if someone can give me a good
> answer to the question... :)
>   What is a .raw file?
>   It is exactly the same as an .iso file; you can just rename it to
>   .iso and write it to CD-R. We use .raw for beta and unofficial
>   images rather than .iso, because... ???

A .raw file is a cd image file in a testing release.  It is not considered
signed off by the image creator and is made available for beta testing.  If
no errors are discovered it is renamed and released as a .iso.  If there is
a problem, the cd image is created and rereleased as a .raw.

Creating this as a .raw extension discourages downloaders from assuming it
is a finished product.



P.S personally disagree with the .raw naming and think it's easier to leave
    it as .iso and educate people about the release process instead but i
    am sure phil has the benefit in experience on this process and go with

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: