On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:27:39PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > I like the fact that .iso extension is used for the released images, and > only the released images, on the master site. > > Of course, that point is moot when the images cease to exist on the > master site, and are only present as jigdos that generate .iso files, > but the fact that the files under potato-test are not .iso files > hopefully acts as a "I don't think we're in Kansas any more" hint to > people that should be in the versioned directory That's kinda silly. By that reasoning shouldn't we give the .deb's in testing a .raw extension? I don't think it occurs to many (any?) people that the reason for the .raw extension is that the .iso hasn't been released yet; instead, people just think .raw is a nutty convention. -- Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgp8XpKRauf5n.pgp
Description: PGP signature