[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Burning a .raw file...



On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:27:39PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> I like the fact that .iso extension is used for the released images, and
> only the released images, on the master site.
> 
> Of course, that point is moot when the images cease to exist on the
> master site, and are only present as jigdos that generate .iso files,
> but the fact that the files under potato-test are not .iso files
> hopefully acts as a "I don't think we're in Kansas any more" hint to
> people that should be in the versioned directory

That's kinda silly. By that reasoning shouldn't we give the .deb's in
testing a .raw extension? I don't think it occurs to many (any?) people
that the reason for the .raw extension is that the .iso hasn't been
released yet; instead, people just think .raw is a nutty convention. 

-- 
Mike Stone

Attachment: pgpWzGrrPP3EQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: