[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jigdo 0.6.0 - testing



On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 10:26:15AM +0000, Wookey wrote:
> > It really should be able to give an error saying that the MD5 sum
> > does not match. Unfortunately, that's very difficult because
> > jigdo-file *never* looks at filenames, it just scans everything
> > and uses whatever matches a part of the image.
> 
> Ah - OK. That explains why when I point it at my debian archive to
> see if it can find the files it needs from there it scans the _whole
> damn thing_, which takes quite a while :-)

It does... :-/
But if you make jigdo-file use a cache (jigdo-lite does) it'll be much
faster the second time.

I think I may be able to add "file:/" support to the jigdo-lite
script. That way, you'll be able to use your local mirror next time.

[.jigdo files broken.]
> So what happens to the unlucky CD-creator at this point? The rsync
> approach will still work in this case. Jigdo is knackered. And all
> the files in an official release _should_ still be on the server.

It turns out they aren't, they were changed since the 2.2r4 release!

For the moment, revert to rsync to get the rest, yes...

In the long run, either
- I manage to exclude from the scan all files that change often (e.g. 
  the keyring) so they end up in the template file,
- or I'll use the fallback mechanism of the jigdo GUI app; if that
  is unable to download from an URL, it can use an alternative one.
  The alternative would point to a CGI script on cdimage, which would
  always be able to supply the data.

> Do the 2.2r4 jigdo files need recreating to match the true state of
> affairs?

Yes, I just started a job on cdimage which recreates the templates,
they are going to appear at
<http://cdimage.debian.org/~atterer/jigdo/2.2r4> over the next hours. 
The keyring, all READMEs etc. are now included in the template files
so they will *not* be downloaded separately by jigdo-lite. This way,
hopefully the problem will not turn up again.

> Anyway I've gone back to using PIK+a script to download the missing
> bits to update my archive+PIK+rsync to get some finished CDs as I
> need them for the w/e.

That's OK - FWIW I think that the first jigdo beta test went down
pretty well. :)

Cheers,

  Richard

-- 
  __   _
  |_) /|  Richard Atterer     |  CS student at the Technische  |  GnuPG key:
  | \/¯|  http://atterer.net  |  Universität München, Germany  |  0x888354F7
  ¯ ´` ¯



Reply to: