Re: A third unsatisfied 2.1_r3 dependency: alpha sendmail --> libc6.1(>= 2.1)
jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> writes:
> i'm just starting to update the 2.1_r3 iso images here and noticed
> that the source cds have not changed at all - is this correct ?
<shuffles feet>
Looks like I cocked up, and failed to generate source CDs.
Watch this space (I'm waiting for enlightenment from Steve McIntyre ;-)
In the mean time, I've moved the source directory back under 2.1_r2 to
try and make it clear what's occurring.
Cheers, Phil.
Reply to: