Processed: [bts-link] source package perl
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package perl
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #944883 (http://bugs.debian.org/944883)
> # Bug title: Syntax error on Math::Complex man page
> # * http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=131037
> # * remote status changed: closed -> new
> usertags 944883 - status-closed
Usertags were: status-closed.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 944883 + status-new
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-new.
> # remote status report for #545899 (http://bugs.debian.org/545899)
> # Bug title: $self->next::method can't find UNIVERSAL
> # * https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/9837
> # * remote status changed: open -> closed
> # * closed upstream
> tags 545899 + fixed-upstream
Bug #545899 [perl] $self->next::method can't find UNIVERSAL
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 545899 - status-open
Usertags were: status-open.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 545899 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #931139 (http://bugs.debian.org/931139)
> # Bug title: perl: switching locales no longer invalidates gettext translation cache
> # * https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/17081
> # * remote status changed: open -> closed
> usertags 931139 - status-open
Usertags were: status-open.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 931139 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
545899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545899
931139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: