Processed: [bts-link] source package src:glibc
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:glibc
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #969926 (http://bugs.debian.org/969926)
> # Bug title: glibc: Parsing of /etc/gshadow can return bad pointers causing segfaults in applications
> # * http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20338
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 969926 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #969926 (http://bugs.debian.org/969926)
> # Bug title: glibc: Parsing of /etc/gshadow can return bad pointers causing segfaults in applications
> # * http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20338
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 969926 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Usertags were: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #969926 (http://bugs.debian.org/969926)
> # Bug title: glibc: Parsing of /etc/gshadow can return bad pointers causing segfaults in applications
> # * http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20338
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 969926 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
969926: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969926
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: