Re: Linking bacula and bacula-doc to their upstream bug database
Hello Carsten,
as of now i see only a single bug open and forwarded to
bugs.bacula.org (bts#593732). The current code we use to parse mantis
bug tracking systems doesnt support authentication, so i'm afraid the
cost/benefit of implementing it is too high (i'm usually focusing on
the fixes/developments that could address the biggest number of
packags/bugs).
if you want to go on and try to implement it yourself, i'd be happy to
review it. you may want to have a look at `remote/secrets.py` and how
jira/github remotes use that file. you can open a MR on salsa when
you're ready.
Regards,
Sandro
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:33 PM Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> bacula uses mantis upstream (https://bugs.bacula.org), the only possible
> complication is that an explicit login is required (anonymous/anomymous
> works for read-only access). Would it be possible to add both bacula and
> bacula-doc to bts-link under these circumstances?
>
> Regards,
>
> Carsten
>
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
Reply to: