[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:ldns



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:ldns
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #     https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #882014 (http://bugs.debian.org/882014)
> # Bug title: ldns: CVE-2017-1000232: Memory corruption in ldns_str2rdf_long_str (double free)
> #  * http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1257
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 882014 + fixed-upstream
Bug #882014 [src:ldns] ldns: CVE-2017-1000232: Memory corruption in ldns_str2rdf_long_str (double free)
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 882014 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #882015 (http://bugs.debian.org/882015)
> # Bug title: ldns: CVE-2017-1000231: Memory corruption in ldns_rr_new_frm_fp_l (double free)
> #  * http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1256
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 882015 + fixed-upstream
Bug #882015 [src:ldns] ldns: CVE-2017-1000231: Memory corruption in ldns_rr_new_frm_fp_l (double free)
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 882015 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
882014: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882014
882015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: