[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package libx11



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libx11
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #522876 (http://bugs.debian.org/522876)
> # Bug title: Cannot start luvcview - SDL error
> #  * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10665
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 522876 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #396871 (http://bugs.debian.org/396871)
> # Bug title: libx11-data: Please recover the fontset order in XLC_LOCALE for zh_TW.UTF-8 locale
> #  * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8762
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 396871 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> # remote status report for #401944 (http://bugs.debian.org/401944)
> # Bug title: libx11-dev: XDrawArc man page maths come out bad on tty
> #  * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9946
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 401944 + status-NEW
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #522876 (http://bugs.debian.org/522876)
> # Bug title: Cannot start luvcview - SDL error
> #  * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10665
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 522876 + status-NEW
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
522876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: