[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package cups



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package cups
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #     https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #818694 (http://bugs.debian.org/818694)
> # Bug title: cups: Assertion `*_head == _item` failed in avahi_entry_group_free
> #  * https://github.com/apple/cups/issues/4793
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
> usertags 818694 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #821788 (http://bugs.debian.org/821788)
> # Bug title: cups: Fix for doc/es/index.html.in
> #  * https://github.com/apple/cups/pull/4807
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
> usertags 821788 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #865649 (http://bugs.debian.org/865649)
> # Bug title: cups HTTPS issues -- Lack of SHA-2 certificate, weak TLSv1.0 crypto
> #  * https://github.com/apple/cups/issues/5037
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
> usertags 865649 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> # remote status report for #899259 (http://bugs.debian.org/899259)
> # Bug title: cups-daemon: with IdleExitTimeout 60, fails to exit after 60 s of inactivity
> #  * https://github.com/apple/cups/issues/5319
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> open
> usertags 899259 + status-open
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-open.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
899259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: