[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package krdc



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package krdc
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #525224 (http://bugs.debian.org/525224)
> # Bug title: krdc: view doesn't automatically pan when remoting into a higher resolution
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231045
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CONFIRMED
> usertags 525224 + status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-CONFIRMED.
> # remote status report for #547801 (http://bugs.debian.org/547801)
> # Bug title: [krdc] Lost sync
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171924
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CONFIRMED
> usertags 547801 + status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-CONFIRMED.
> # remote status report for #557977 (http://bugs.debian.org/557977)
> # Bug title: Remaps the window on (unexpected) disconnect, causing it to interrupt my work
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216125
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
> usertags 557977 + status-UNCONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-UNCONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-UNCONFIRMED.
> # remote status report for #686274 (http://bugs.debian.org/686274)
> # Bug title: krdc: incorrect state of meta (Alt) key in remote desktop
> #  * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200776
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> CONFIRMED
> usertags 686274 + status-CONFIRMED
Usertags were: status-CONFIRMED.
Usertags are now: status-CONFIRMED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
686274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: