[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package eclipse



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package eclipse
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #352197 (http://bugs.debian.org/352197)
> # Bug title: eclipse: locally installed plugins vanished
> #  * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=142917
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> WONTFIX
> usertags 352197 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WONTFIX
Usertags were: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED.
Usertags are now: resolution-WONTFIX status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #595282 (http://bugs.debian.org/595282)
> # Bug title: eclipse: Update 3.5.2-5 -> 3.5.2-6 causes Android SDK plugin to stop working
> #  * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=304132
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 595282 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Usertags were: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #595282 (http://bugs.debian.org/595282)
> # Bug title: eclipse: Update 3.5.2-5 -> 3.5.2-6 causes Android SDK plugin to stop working
> #  * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=304132
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 595282 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
595282: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: