Processed: [bts-link] source package baobab
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package baobab
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #433266 (http://bugs.debian.org/433266)
> # Bug title: gnome-utils: launch nautilus or a terminal or something from baobab
> # * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461492
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 433266 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> # remote status report for #719362 (http://bugs.debian.org/719362)
> # Bug title: baobab: add file count view
> # * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618017
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 719362 + status-NEW
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #790416 (http://bugs.debian.org/790416)
> # Bug title: shall display dotfiles
> # * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451393
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 790416 + status-NEW
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #520512 (http://bugs.debian.org/520512)
> # Bug title: gnome-utils: baobab: Allow to export screen in whatever format
> # * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402383
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> usertags 520512 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
520512: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520512
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Reply to: